All of my formal writing classes have happened during the summer. At Keene I did the 2005 Writing Conference, and this past summer I participated in the National Writing Project’s summer institute. My music training, however, has spanned seasons.
I chose breadth over depth in learning instruments, which sated my generalist appetite but left me frustrated that I don’t have an artistic medium in which I feel effective. Over the past year I’ve decided to focus mainly on writing. So far it hasn’t amounted to much, but I will work diligently.
Yet when I try to transpose some of my music studies to writing, I’m at a loss. Mainly, there’s no equivalent in literature to a musical etude. I can’t “practice” a piece for thirty minutes each day. It’s a constant work of composition. There’s no Chopin to help me master the black keys in writing.
My piano instructor at Keene, whom I had for only a semester, told me that I was a good example of how much one can improve with consistent practice. I would go into the piano room each day and work on a section for a half an hour. By the end of the semester I could play the whole piece by memory.
When I mentioned this incompatibility to a good friend, he suggested that the closest equivalent of a “writing etude” is in typography. But that doesn’t do it for me. I want something that is versatile, fitting different techniques and abilities in performing writing, just as an etude does for the musician.
Maybe the writing equivalent of a musical etude is reading. The “performer” gives the text a voice, and makes an interpretation. Different styles and genres require different approaches and skills. Though does that mean the reader needs to then write, in response or imitation, to fully practice?
Dragon Ball Daima S.H.Figuarts Vegeta
1 day ago