Special Topics In Calamity Physics uses the name of a great literary work for each chapter’s title. The chapter’s themes and story development, I’m told, then connect to the referenced text. On the prose level, Marisha Pessl makes constant allusions and citations, some of which I get and many of which I probably don’t even notice. I like the book so far, and I feel satisfied when I understand a reference. Yet I want to know what I’m missing.
I’ll take the GRE General Test in October. But to prepare for standardized testing, and out of curiosity, I’m trying the practice exam for the GRE Subject: English test. Between this and Special Topics In Calamity Physics, the world of literature looks daunting. Still, I wonder how much the great writers read. Or great thinkers. Not that I’ll be either of those, but how important is it to cover the canon?
NECA TMNT Toon “Binky’s Day Out” Slash V2
18 hours ago
1 comment:
Covering the canon keeps you from restating things and not adding value. It helps you find your own voice. It provides a well for reasearch and a font for inspiration. It can elevate your understanding and illuminate your vision. It can also become a trap, but I fear not that outcome for you.
Some great writers and thinkers read little, others had vast libraries, salons and symposiums. Physics and math and engineering require you learn the practical canon, but you don't need to read Euclid, Copernicus, Newton and Faraday. Experience can be obtained many ways.
Post a Comment